1965 Cadillac Calais vs. 1988 Opel Omega
To start off, 1988 Opel Omega is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1988 Opel Omega. (89 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1988 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 810 kg more than 1988 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Calais | 1988 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Cadillac | Opel |
| Model | Calais | Omega |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2740 mm |
