1965 Cadillac Calais vs. 1990 Citroen XM
To start off, 1990 Citroen XM is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1990 Citroen XM. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1990 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 730 kg more than 1990 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Calais | 1990 Citroen XM | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | Calais | XM |
Year Released | 1965 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 66 L |