1965 Cadillac Calais vs. 2002 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2002 Chrysler 300 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler 300 (251 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Calais. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 377 kg more than 2002 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Calais | 2002 Chrysler 300 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | Calais | 300 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3523 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1633 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 65 L |
