1965 Cadillac Calais vs. 2003 Lada Niva
To start off, 2003 Lada Niva is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2003 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2003 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 800 kg more than 2003 Lada Niva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Calais | 2003 Lada Niva | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lada |
| Model | Calais | Niva |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1688 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 42 L |
