1965 Cadillac Calais vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2003 Volvo C70. (160 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 610 kg more than 2003 Volvo C70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Calais | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Calais | C70 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 68 L |
