1965 Cadillac Calais vs. 2004 Ford Expedition

To start off, 2004 Ford Expedition is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Expedition (232 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Calais. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Expedition weights approximately 357 kg more than 1965 Cadillac Calais. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Cadillac Calais 2004 Ford Expedition
Make Cadillac Ford
Model Calais Expedition
Year Released 1965 2004
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7029 cc 4603 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 208 HP 232 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6250 RPM
Number of Seats 5 seats 8 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2010 kg 2367 kg
Vehicle Length 5700 mm 5230 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 2010 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1980 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 3030 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 95 L 106 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]