1965 Cadillac Calais vs. 2004 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2004 Toyota Mark II is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Mark II. (156 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 390 kg more than 2004 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Calais | 2004 Toyota Mark II | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | Calais | Mark II |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 72 L |
