1965 Cadillac Calais vs. 2005 Ford Puma
To start off, 2005 Ford Puma is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2005 Ford Puma. (100 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 975 kg more than 2005 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Calais | 2005 Ford Puma | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Calais | Puma |
Year Released | 1965 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 45 L |