1965 Cadillac Calais vs. 2006 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Calais (208 HP) has 63 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Croma. (145 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 635 kg more than 2006 Fiat Croma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Calais | 2006 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | Calais | Croma |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2197 cc |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 145 HP |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 62 L |