1965 Cadillac Calais vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 835 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Calais | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Calais | Colt |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2835 cc |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2970 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 95 L |
