1965 Cadillac Calais vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 456 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Calais | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Calais | 3 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1554 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 55 L |
