1965 Cadillac Calais vs. 2012 Buick Regal
To start off, 2012 Buick Regal is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2012 Buick Regal. (182 HP @ 6700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2012 Buick Regal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 377 kg more than 2012 Buick Regal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Calais | 2012 Buick Regal | |
| Make | Cadillac | Buick |
| Model | Calais | Regal |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1633 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4831 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1857 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2738 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 68 L |
