1965 Cadillac Calais vs. 2013 Chevrolet Traverse
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Traverse (277 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Calais. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Traverse should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Traverse weights approximately 128 kg more than 1965 Cadillac Calais. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Calais | 2013 Chevrolet Traverse | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | Calais | Traverse |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 277 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 2138 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5173 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1991 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1846 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3020 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 83 L |
