1965 Cadillac Calais vs. 2013 Honda Accord
To start off, 2013 Honda Accord is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2013 Honda Accord. (182 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2013 Honda Accord. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 528 kg more than 2013 Honda Accord. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Calais | 2013 Honda Accord | |
| Make | Cadillac | Honda |
| Model | Calais | Accord |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2356 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1482 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1436 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2725 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 65 L |
