1965 Cadillac Calais vs. 2013 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2013 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota 4Runner (266 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Calais. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 174 kg more than 1965 Cadillac Calais. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Calais | 2013 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Calais | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 2184 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 87 L |