1965 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1952 Fiat 1400
To start off, 1965 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 165 more horse power than 1952 Fiat 1400. (43 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 900 kg more than 1952 Fiat 1400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac DeVille | 1952 Fiat 1400 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | DeVille | 1400 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7027 cc | 1394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 43 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 50 L |
