1965 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1967 Mini MK I

To start off, 1967 Mini MK I is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1967 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1967 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1385 kg more than 1967 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1965 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 1967 Mini MK I has manual transmission. 1967 Mini MK I will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1965 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: