1965 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1972 Citroen SM
To start off, 1972 Citroen SM is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1972 Citroen SM. (180 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1972 Citroen SM.
Because 1965 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Citroen SM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1965 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 1972 Citroen SM has manual transmission. 1972 Citroen SM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1965 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac DeVille | 1972 Citroen SM | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | DeVille | SM |
Year Released | 1965 | 1972 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2668 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 180 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2960 mm |