1965 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1978 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1978 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1965 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac DeVille | 1978 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | DeVille | Colt |
Year Released | 1965 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2050 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2310 mm |