1965 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1979 Volvo 265
To start off, 1979 Volvo 265 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 265. (148 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 265. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 630 kg more than 1979 Volvo 265. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac DeVille | 1979 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | DeVille | 265 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 2662 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2660 mm |