1965 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1982 Holden Camira
To start off, 1982 Holden Camira is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1982 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1010 kg more than 1982 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac DeVille | 1982 Holden Camira | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | DeVille | Camira |
Year Released | 1965 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2050 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2580 mm |