1965 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1998 De Tomaso Mangusta
To start off, 1998 De Tomaso Mangusta is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 De Tomaso Mangusta (321 HP) has 113 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 De Tomaso Mangusta should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 630 kg more than 1998 De Tomaso Mangusta.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac DeVille | 1998 De Tomaso Mangusta | |
Make | Cadillac | De Tomaso |
Model | DeVille | Mangusta |
Year Released | 1965 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 321 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |