1965 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2000 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2000 GMC Sierra is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2000 GMC Sierra. (197 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 275 kg more than 2000 GMC Sierra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac DeVille | 2000 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Cadillac | GMC |
Model | DeVille | Sierra |
Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2050 kg | 1775 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3030 mm |