1965 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2003 Ford Econovan is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 755 kg more than 2003 Ford Econovan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 Ford Econovan | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DeVille | Econovan |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2050 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2210 mm |