1965 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Mazda 3

To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 3. (143 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 720 kg more than 2003 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Cadillac DeVille 2003 Mazda 3
Make Cadillac Mazda
Model DeVille 3
Year Released 1965 2003
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7027 cc 1970 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 208 HP 143 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2030 kg 1310 kg
Vehicle Length 5700 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2730 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 95 L 55 L