1965 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2009 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2009 Subaru Forester is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Subaru Forester (225 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 595 kg more than 2009 Subaru Forester.
Because 2009 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac DeVille | 2009 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
Model | DeVille | Forester |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 64 L |