1965 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2010 Cadillac BLS. (176 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2010 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 464 kg more than 2010 Cadillac BLS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac DeVille | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | DeVille | BLS |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1566 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 58 L |