1965 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2013 BMW M6
To start off, 2013 BMW M6 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW M6 (552 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 344 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 70 kg more than 2013 BMW M6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac DeVille | 2013 BMW M6 | |
Make | Cadillac | BMW |
Model | DeVille | M6 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 552 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4903 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2106 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1374 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2851 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 80 L |