1965 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1970 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1970 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1970 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1970 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1155 kg more than 1970 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Eldorado | 1970 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Eldorado | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2480 mm |