1965 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1984 Volvo 760
To start off, 1984 Volvo 760 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1984 Volvo 760. (153 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1984 Volvo 760. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 780 kg more than 1984 Volvo 760. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Eldorado | 1984 Volvo 760 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Eldorado | 760 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2849 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1335 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2780 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 68 L |
