1965 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1997 Proton 400
To start off, 1997 Proton 400 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1997 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1997 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1145 kg more than 1997 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Cadillac Eldorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Eldorado | 1997 Proton 400 | |
Make | Cadillac | Proton |
Model | Eldorado | 400 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2510 mm |