1965 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2000 Subaru STX
To start off, 2000 Subaru STX is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2000 Subaru STX. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2000 Subaru STX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 505 kg more than 2000 Subaru STX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Subaru STX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru STX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Eldorado | 2000 Subaru STX | |
| Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
| Model | Eldorado | STX |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 165 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2660 mm |
