1965 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2009 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mitsubishi Raider (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 575 kg more than 2009 Mitsubishi Raider.
Because 2009 Mitsubishi Raider is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mitsubishi Raider will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Eldorado | 2009 Mitsubishi Raider | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | Eldorado | Raider |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 83 L |