1965 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE

To start off, 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE (279 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 301 kg more than 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE.

Because 1965 Cadillac Eldorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Cadillac Eldorado 2013 Chrysler 200 CONVERTIBLE
Make Cadillac Chrysler
Model Eldorado 200 CONVERTIBLE
Year Released 1965 2013
Body Type Convertible Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7029 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 208 HP 279 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2115 kg 1814 kg
Vehicle Length 5700 mm 4947 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 2089 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2765 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 82 L 64 L