1965 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2013 Infiniti FX
To start off, 2013 Infiniti FX is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Infiniti FX (385 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Infiniti FX should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 48 kg more than 2013 Infiniti FX.
Because 2013 Infiniti FX is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Infiniti FX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Eldorado | 2013 Infiniti FX | |
Make | Cadillac | Infiniti |
Model | Eldorado | FX |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Natural Gas (CNG) |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 2067 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1928 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2885 mm |