1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1942 Jeep MB
To start off, 1965 Cadillac Sixty is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Jeep MB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Jeep MB would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1942 Jeep MB. (59 HP @ 3820 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1942 Jeep MB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1035 kg more than 1942 Jeep MB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1942 Jeep MB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1942 Jeep MB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Sixty | 1942 Jeep MB | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
| Model | Sixty | MB |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1942 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3820 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2040 mm |
