1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1954 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1965 Cadillac Sixty is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 1954 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Sixty | 12 M |
Year Released | 1965 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2500 mm |