1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1954 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1965 Cadillac Sixty is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (136 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 935 kg more than 1954 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 1954 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | Sixty | CJ |
Year Released | 1965 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2060 mm |