1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1965 Cadillac Sixty is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 815 kg more than 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Cadillac | Studebaker |
Model | Sixty | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1965 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2980 mm |