1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1978 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 1978 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 640 kg more than 1978 Chevrolet Malibu.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 1978 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Sixty | Malibu |
Year Released | 1965 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3788 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2760 mm |