1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1982 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1982 Mercury Cougar is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 635 kg more than 1982 Mercury Cougar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 1982 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
Model | Sixty | Cougar |
Year Released | 1965 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2650 mm |