1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1982 Opel Kadett
To start off, 1982 Opel Kadett is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1330 kg more than 1982 Opel Kadett.
Because 1965 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Opel Kadett, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 1982 Opel Kadett | |
Make | Cadillac | Opel |
Model | Sixty | Kadett |
Year Released | 1965 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2520 mm |