1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1994 Mazda 626
To start off, 1994 Mazda 626 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1994 Mazda 626. (108 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 895 kg more than 1994 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Sixty | 1994 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Sixty | 626 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2620 mm |
