1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1996 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro (435 HP) has 227 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 928 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 1996 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Sixty | Camaro |
Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 6276 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 435 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1187 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2570 mm |