1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1996 Italdesign Formula 4
To start off, 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1996 Italdesign Formula 4. (147 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1996 Italdesign Formula 4.
Because 1965 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Italdesign Formula 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 | |
Make | Cadillac | Italdesign |
Model | Sixty | Formula 4 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 147 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2550 mm |