1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1997 Chevrolet Malibu

To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1997 Chevrolet Malibu. (150 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1997 Chevrolet Malibu. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 730 kg more than 1997 Chevrolet Malibu. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Cadillac Sixty 1997 Chevrolet Malibu
Make Cadillac Chevrolet
Model Sixty Malibu
Year Released 1965 1997
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7029 cc 2392 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 208 HP 150 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 2115 kg 1385 kg
Vehicle Length 5790 mm 4850 mm
Vehicle Width 1990 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 3390 mm 2760 mm