1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1999 Ford Fiesta
To start off, 1999 Ford Fiesta is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1999 Ford Fiesta. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Fiesta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1193 kg more than 1999 Ford Fiesta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 1999 Ford Fiesta | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Sixty | Fiesta |
Year Released | 1965 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 922 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 40 L |