1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2000 Volkswagen Lupo

To start off, 2000 Volkswagen Lupo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2000 Volkswagen Lupo. (103 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2000 Volkswagen Lupo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1209 kg more than 2000 Volkswagen Lupo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1965 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Lupo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1965 Cadillac Sixty 2000 Volkswagen Lupo
Make Cadillac Volkswagen
Model Sixty Lupo
Year Released 1965 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7029 cc 1390 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 208 HP 103 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6200 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 2115 kg 906 kg
Vehicle Length 5790 mm 3540 mm
Vehicle Width 1990 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 3390 mm 2330 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 95 L 34 L