1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2004 Chevrolet Silverado
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Silverado is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Silverado (300 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Silverado should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 180 kg more than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2004 Chevrolet Silverado | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | Sixty | Silverado |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 5965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 2295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 3440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 129 L |
