1965 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2004 Kia Sedona
To start off, 2004 Kia Sedona is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2004 Kia Sedona. (195 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2004 Kia Sedona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Sedona weights approximately 63 kg more than 1965 Cadillac Sixty.
Because 1965 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Sedona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Cadillac Sixty | 2004 Kia Sedona | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | Sixty | Sedona |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 2178 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 75 L |